ArticleInternational journal of environmental science and technology : IJEST2024
A biochar selection method for remediating heavy metal contaminated mine tailings.
Article in International journal of environmental science and technology : IJEST, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of biochar on soil properties as well as available and TCLP-extractable Cu contents: a global meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Approximately 390,000 abandoned mines across the US pose considerable, pervasive risks to human and environmental health; world-wide the problem is even greater. Lime, organic materials, and other amendments have been used to decrease metal bioavailability (e.g., Cd, Cu, Mn, Ni, Zn) in contaminated mine wastes and to promote plant community establishment for tailings stabilization. Biochar properties (e.g., alkaline pH, metal sorbing capabilities, available nutrients, improved soil water retention) make it a potential amendment for remediating metal contaminated mine tailings. A three-step procedure was developed to identify biochars that were most effective at reducing heavy metal availability, retaining metals, and subsequently selecting biochars for use in a soil amendment laboratory trial to ultimately be utilized in heavy metal contaminated mine land settings: Step (1) a synthetic precipitation leaching procedure extract of mine tailings was produced, representing potentially available metals, and used to identify metal removal properties of 28 different biochars (e.g., made from various feedstocks and pyrolysis or gasification conditions); Step (2) evaluate how well biochars retained previously sorbed metals; and Step (3) laboratory evaluation of the most promising biochars that removed and did not releases metals, applied at 0, 1, 2.5, and 5% (by wt) to mine tailings for reducing metal bioavailability. The reported methodology and results from this study could be used to quickly identify specific biochars and application rates to reduce mine tailings metal availability and aid in future remediation of abandoned mine sites globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.