ArticleJACC. Advances2024
Consequences of Recurrent Hyperkalemia on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Mortality.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Current primary care management of patients with hyperkalemia in Germany - Findings on monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment of elevated potassium levels].Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Article
- [Consensus recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of hyperkalemia of the Austrian Society of Nephrology 2026].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Review
- Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Duration and Hyperkalemia-Related Healthcare Encounters in Patients with Heart Failure and Cardio/Renal Dysfunction: The GALVANIZE Outcome Study.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hyperkalemia (HK) has been linked to serious cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, but the impact of recurrent HK on these outcomes is ill-defined. Objectives: This study evaluated mortality and CV outcomes associated with recurrent HK vs normokalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and in a subset of patients with co-occurring heart failure (HF). Methods: REVOLUTIONIZE III was a retrospective cohort study of adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with stage 3/4 CKD, with or without HF in Optum's deidentified Market Clarity database (January 2016 to August 2022). Patients with recurrent HK (≥2 events) were exactly and propensity score-matched to patients with normokalemia (no serum [K+] <3.5 or >5.0 mmol/L or HK diagnosis ever). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints were CV outcomes including major adverse CV events plus (major adverse cardiovascular event or hospitalization with heart failure [MACE+]; defined as all-cause mortality or hospitalized myocardial infarction, stroke, or HF and hospitalized arrhythmia). Cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare outcomes between cohorts. Results: The study included 6,337 matched pairs overall, including 2,129 with HF. Characteristics of the samples were well-balanced. Recurrent HK was associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR overall: 1.29 [95% CI: 1.20-1.38]; HF substudy: 1.30 [95% CI: 1.18-1.44]), MACE+ (overall: 1.53 [95% CI: 1.43-1.65]; HF substudy: 1.45 [95% CI: 1.29-1.64]), and hospitalized arrhythmia (overall: 1.94 [95% CI: 1.74-2.16]; HF substudy: 1.85 [95% CI: 1.55-2.21]) compared with normokalemia. Conclusions: In patients with CKD, recurrent HK increased the risks of all-cause mortality, MACE+, and hospitalized arrhythmia compared with normokalemia, including in a subset of patients with HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.