ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
A real-world pharmacovigilance study of Sorafenib based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-marketing safety profile of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide: a FAERS pharmacovigilance study with EudraVigilance validation and mechanistic investigation of pancreatitis.Virology journal · 2026Article
- TargetingJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2026Article
- Adverse reactions of second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: a descriptive analysis from WHO-VigiAccess.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Adverse Reactions of First-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment: A Descriptive Analysis From WHO-VigiAccess.International journal of hepatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The primary objective of this study was to closely monitor and identify adverse events (AEs) associated with Sorafenib, a pharmacological therapeutic agent used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and thyroid cancer. The ultimate goal was to optimize patient safety and provide evidence-based guidance for the appropriate use of this drug. Methods: Reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database were comprehensively collected and analyzed, covering the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2024. Disproportionality analysis was performed using robust algorithms for effective data mining to quantify the signals associated with Sorafenib-related AEs. Results: In total, we identifued 18,624 patients (82,857 AEs in the Sorafenib population) from the collected reports and examined, the occurrence of Sorafenib-induced AEs in 26 organ systems. The study results revealed the presence of the expected AEs, including Diarrhoea, Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Fatigue, and Rash, which was consistent with the information provided in the drug insert. In addition, unexpected significant AEs, such as Gait inability, Palmoplantar keratoderma and Hyperkeratosis were observed at the preferred term (PT) level. These findings suggest the potential occurrence of adverse reactions not currently documented in drug descriptions. Conclusion: This study successfully detected new and unforeseen signals associated with Sorafenib-related AEs related to Sorafenib administration, providing important insights into the complex correlations between AEs and Sorafenib use. The results of this study emphasize the critical importance of continuous and vigilant surveillance for the timely identification and effective management of AEs to improve the overall patient safety and wellbeing in the context of Sorafenib therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.