ArticleCureus2024
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of White Spot Lesion Management Among Dental Professionals in South India: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Dentists Regarding the Diagnosis and Management of White Spot Lesions.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction White spot lesions (WSLs) are opacities formed due to decalcification occurring in the enamel's subsurface layer. These lesions are most commonly seen in patients during and after fixed orthodontic treatment due to undisturbed accumulation of plaque. Other factors that can predispose to WSLs are enamel hypomineralization, hypomaturation, hypoplasia, and disruption in the levels of salivary calcium, phosphate, bicarbonate, and fluoride. Though these lesions produce aesthetic mishaps, they go unattended because of the lack of clinical knowledge in interpretation and diagnosis. Aim This study aimed to determine the knowledge, attitude, and practice of dental professionals regarding the management of WSLs. Materials and methods Participants in a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey included undergraduate practitioners, postgraduates, and specialists. Formulated in English, the questionnaire comprised 21 structured questions circulated through online media across India. Results The assessment of knowledge and awareness highlighted participants' understanding of WSL, underscoring fundamental knowledge shared across dental professionals. The attitudes toward WSL treatment showed a similar belief among participants, including undergraduate practitioners and specialists, regarding the necessity of treating WSL. Furthermore, the analysis of practice patterns revealed consistent diagnostic methods among dental professionals, with specialists showing slightly higher adherence to drying techniques for enhanced visibility. Statistical analysis Data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), with descriptive statistics presented in frequencies, percentages, and means. Comparisons were made across different categories of dental professionals to examine variations in responses and practices. Conclusion Because untreated WSL can progress into cavities, a thorough understanding of the etiology, clinical picture, and early diagnosis is crucial in planning the treatment and managing patients' aesthetic demands and the tooth's function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.