ReviewCureus2024
Risk of Recurrent and Frequent Preterm Birth Among Women With Mitral Valve Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preterm delivery remains a prominent problem in obstetrics with significant adverse implications for both mothers and the offspring. The incidence of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) in women of childbearing age has raised concerns about pregnancy and pregnancy connotations. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to help in understanding the plausibility of the association between MVP and preterm birth in women with a history of frequent deliveries. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched the databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus, for studies published in the period 1999 through 2024. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies such as cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies related to women diagnosed with MVP out of a total number of 1,029 articles found. Overall, a total of 19 studies were included in this review, with 3 of which were considered for further meta-analysis. It was revealed in the analysis that there was an association between MVP and preterm delivery when the severity of MVP was at Types II and III. The evidence also underscores the importance of both follow-up and preemptive measures among women suffering from MV prolapse for improved maternal and neonatal outcomes. The average Z-value (4.47) and p-value (0.00) for the test for overall effect size indicate the presence of a high correlation between MVP and premature delivery, suggesting satisfactory statistics on the association. The findings do indicate that MVP is a risk factor for preterm delivery (pooled ES = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.35, P <0.001).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.