ArticleJournal of pharmacopuncture2024
Assessing Hwa-byung Vulnerability Using the Hwa-byung Personality Scale: a comparative study of machine learning approaches.
Article in Journal of pharmacopuncture, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Racial Discrimination and Hwa-byung, a Korean Medicine-Based Anger Syndrome, among Foreign Residents in South Korea: a cross-sectional study.Journal of pharmacopuncture · 2026Article
- A multidimensional risk prediction framework for malignant intestinal obstruction based on machine learning: computational model development and clinical validation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To develop and compare machine learning models to classify individuals vulnerable to Hwa-byung (HB) using an existing HB personality scale and to evaluate the efficacy of these models in predicting HB vulnerability. Methods: We analyzed data from 500 Korean adults (aged 19-44) using HB personality and symptom scales. We used various machine learning techniques, including the random forest classifier (RFC), XGBoost classifier, logistic regression, and their ensemble method (RFC-XGC-LR). The models were developed using recursive feature elimination with cross-validation for feature selection and evaluated using multiple performance metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results: The 16 items on the HB personality scale were identified as optimal features to predict high HB symptom scores requiring further clinical evaluation. The ensemble model slightly outperformed the other models, with an accuracy of 0.80 and an AUROC of 0.86, in the test set. Notably, item 16 (" Conclusion: Machine learning models, particularly the ensemble method, show capabilities promising for screening individuals with high HB symptom scores based on personality traits, potentially facilitating early referral for clinical evaluation. These models can improve the efficiency and accuracy of the HB risk assessment in clinical settings, potentially aiding early intervention and prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.