Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39741545›Full record

Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2024

Energy Consumption Prediction of Additive Manufactured Tensile Strength Parts Using Artificial Intelligence.

Osman Ulkir, Mehmet Said Bayraklılar, Melih Kuncan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Osman UlkirDepartment of Electric and Energy, Mus Alparslan University, Mus, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1095-0160
Mehmet Said BayraklılarDepartment of Civil Engineering, Siirt University, Siirt, Turkey.
Melih KuncanDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Siirt University, Siirt, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9749-0418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The manufacturing sector's interest in additive manufacturing (AM) methods is increasing daily. The increase in energy consumption requires optimization of energy consumption in rapid prototyping technology. This study aims to minimize energy consumption with determined production parameters. Four machine learning algorithms are preferred to model the energy consumption of the fused deposition modeling-based 3D printer. The real-time measured test sample data were trained, and the prediction model between the parameters of 3D fabrication and the energy consumption was created. The predicted model was evaluated using five performance criteria. These are mean square error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE),

Indexed as

3D printeradditive manufacturingenergy consumptionfused deposition modelingmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39741545
PMCPMC11683429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.