ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024
Exploring neural mechanisms of gender differences in bodily emotion recognition: a time-frequency analysis and network analysis study.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to explore the neural mechanisms underlying gender differences in recognizing emotional expressions conveyed through body language. Utilizing electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings, we examined the impact of gender on neural responses through time-frequency analysis and network analysis to uncover gender disparities in bodily emotion recognition. Methods: The study included 34 participants, consisting of 18 males and 16 females. A 2 × 2 mixed design was employed, with gender (male and female) and bodily emotion (happy and sad) as the independent variables. Both behavioral and EEG data were collected simultaneously. Results: Males demonstrated more stable brain activity patterns when recognizing different bodily emotions, while females showed more intricate and highly interconnected brain activity networks, especially when identifying negative emotions like sadness. Differences based on gender were also observed in the significance of brain regions; males had greater importance in central brain areas, whereas females exhibited higher significance in the parietal lobe. Conclusion: Gender differences do influence the recognition of bodily emotions to some extent. The primary aim of this study was to explore the neural mechanisms underlying gender differences in bodily emotion recognition, with a particular focus on time-frequency analysis and network analysis based on electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. By elucidating the role of gender in cognitive development, this study contributes to early detection and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.