Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39741528›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2024

Comparative Algorithms for Identifying and Counting Hospitalisation Episodes of Care for Coronary Heart Disease Using Administrative Data.

Derrick Lopez, Juan Lu, Frank M Sanfilippo, Judith M Katzenellenbogen, Tom Briffa, Lee Nedkoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Derrick LopezCardiovascular Epidemiology Research Centre, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0677-0420
Juan LuCardiovascular Epidemiology Research Centre, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Frank M SanfilippoCardiovascular Epidemiology Research Centre, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3639-0787
Judith M KatzenellenbogenCardiovascular Epidemiology Research Centre, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5287-5819
Tom BriffaCardiovascular Epidemiology Research Centre, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Lee NedkoffCardiovascular Epidemiology Research Centre, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3970-625X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Measures of disease burden using hospital administrative data are susceptible to over-inflation if the patient is transferred during their episode of care. We aimed to identify and compare measures of coronary heart disease (CHD) and myocardial infarction (MI) episodes using six algorithms that account for transfers. Patient and Methods: We used person-linked hospitalisations for CHD and MI for 2000-2016 in Western Australia based on the interval between discharge and subsequent admission (date, datetime algorithms), pathway (admission source, discharge destination) and any combination to generate machine learning models (random forest [RF], gradient boosting machine [GBM]). The date and datetime algorithms used deidentified patient identifiers to identify records belonging to the same individual. We calculated counts, age-standardised rates (ASR) and age-adjusted trends for CHD and MI for each algorithm. Results: Counts of CHD increased from 11,733 in 2000 to 13,274 in 2016, while MI increased from 2605 to 4480 using the date algorithm. Correspondingly ASR for CHD decreased from 2086.2 to 1463.1 while MI increased from 468.2 to 498.1 per 100,000 person-years. ASR for CHD and MI for datetime algorithm were consistently 1-2% higher than the date algorithm. Differences in ASR of CHD and MI counts increased over time with the admission source, RF and GBM algorithms relative to the date algorithm. Age-adjusted trends in CHD and MI episode rates using RF and GBM differed significantly from all other algorithms. Only 86.7% and 87.6% of MI episodes identified by the date algorithm were identified by the admission source and discharge destination algorithms, respectively. Conclusion: The date and datetime algorithms produced the most valid measures of CHD and MI episodes. Findings underscore the importance of identifying admission and discharge dates/times belonging to the same individual in enumerating these episodes.

Indexed as

patient transferratestrendsWestern Australia

Identifiers

PMID39741528
PMCPMC11687321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.