ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024
Analysis of the implementation value of abdominal B-ultrasound combined with cervical cerclage in the prevention and treatment of late recurrent spontaneous abortion.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the implementation value of abdominal B-ultrasound combined with cervical cerclage in the prevention and treatment of recurrent late abortion.
methodsFrom October 2020 to December 2023, 196 pregnant patients who had a history of late abortions at our institution were chosen. They were divided into groups based on the treatments used. In the observational team, 98 instances received abdominal B-ultrasound along with cervical cerclage, while 98 instances in the controlling team underwent traditional conservative treatment. Vaginal flora, inflammatory factor levels, labor outcomes, uterine artery parameters, and adverse effects were observed in both groups of pregnant women.
resultsComparing the detection of vaginal flora between the two groups, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05); the detection values of WBC, neutrophil percentage and neutrophil absolute value in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The recurrent late abortion rate (4.08%) and premature delivery rate (16.33%) were lower than those of the control group, and the full-term delivery rate (79.59%) and total fetal survival rate (93.88%) were higher than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The resistance index (RI) and pulsatility index (PI) of pregnant women with abortion were higher than those of live birth pregnant women. The RI and PI of group A (pregnant women with recurrent late abortion) at 7, 12, 24 and 32 weeks of gestation were also higher than those of group B (pregnant women without recurrent late abortion), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At 7 weeks of gestation, there was no statistical difference between the observation and control groups in terms of RI and PI (P > 0.05)0.12 By 32 weeks of gestation, the RI and PI were lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05)0.13 In the observation group, the RI and PI were lower than in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, and eclampsia were significantly lower in the observation group compared to the control group (P < 0.05).
conclusionAbdominal ultrasound combined with cervical cerclage reduces the risk of miscarriage by improving the hemodynamic status of the uterus and placenta, and also optimizes the pregnancy environment by reducing the inflammatory response in the uterine cavity, which has important clinical applications in the prevention and treatment of late recurrent spontaneous abortion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.