ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2024
Combination of Compound Kushen injection with first-line treatment versus first-line treatment alone for advanced colorectal cancer: a study protocol for a multicenter, openlabel, randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) has progressed slowly, with chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy being the first-line treatment for the disease, but the improvement in efficacy is not satisfactory. Compound Kushen injection (CKI) is one of the representative drugs of anti-cancer Chinese herbal injection drugs, which has been widely used in the adjunct treatment of cancer in China. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CKI combined with first-line treatment of advanced CRC.
methodsThis is a multicenter, randomized, open-label controlled clinical trial in which 320 patients with advanced CRC will be randomly assigned to the treatment group or the control group in a 1:1 ratio. Both groups will receive at least 4 cycles of first-line therapy (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI/CAPEOX ± cetuximab/bevacizumab) in 14-21 day cycles, and the experimental group will receive additional CKI with a cumulative dose of 200 ml per cycle. Patients who achieve a complete response, partial response, or stable disease after 4-6 months will receive maintenance therapy until disease progression or another endpoint event, such as toxicity or death, occurs.. Follow-up will occur every 3 months until death or loss to follow-up. The primary outcome of this study will be progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes will be overall survival (OS), 1-year OS rate, 1-year PFS rate, objective response rate,disease control rate, symptoms and quality of life evaluation. Safety outcomes will be incidence of adverse events. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of CKI when combined with first-line treatment in the treatment of advanced CRC, with PFS as the primary outcome. It aims to clarify the clinical advantages and therapeutic effect of CKI in the treatment of advanced CRC. To identify the benefit population of CKI in the treatment of patients with advanced CRC, an enrichment design based on biomarkers will be utilized. Metabolomics and gut microbiota analysis will be conducted on biological samples to explore the metabolic and gut microbiota differences associated with the efficacy of CKI, guiding further research into its mechanism of action.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.govNCT05894694. Registered on 4 August 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.