ArticleFood and environmental virology2024
Magnetic Carbon Bead-Based Concentration Method for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Wastewater.
Article in Food and environmental virology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wastewater surveillance for pathogens is important to monitor disease trends within communities and maintain public health; thus, a quick and reliable protocol is needed to quantify pathogens present in wastewater. In this study, a method using a commercially available magnetic carbon bead-based kit, i.e., the Carbon Prep (C.prep) method (Life Magnetics), was employed to detect and quantify severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as well as bacteriophage Phi6 and pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) in wastewater samples. The performance of this method was evaluated by modifying several steps and comparing it with the polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation method to demonstrate its applicability to virus detection in wastewater. The protocol of the C.prep method, based on the manufacturer's instructions, could not detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA, while the optimized protocol could detect it in the tested samples at concentrations that were not significantly different from those obtained using the PEG precipitation method. However, the optimized C.prep method performed more poorly in recovering Phi6 and detecting PMMoV than the PEG precipitation method. The results of this study indicated that the full workflow of the C.prep method was not sufficient to detect the target viruses in wastewater and that an additional RNA extraction step was needed to increase its detection sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39741220What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.