ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2025
EGFR status assessment using reflex testing targeted next-generation sequencing for resected non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence ofTranslational lung cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
EGFR status assessment is mandatory for adjuvant decision-making of resected stage IB-IIIA non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC). It is questionable whether single-gene RT-PCR versus next-generation sequencing (NGS) should be used for this evaluation. Moreover, co-occurring mutations have an impact on tumor behavior and may influence future therapeutic decision-making. We aimed to describe the clinico-pathological and molecular features, as well as the prognostic factors of resected EGFR-mutant NS-NSCLC evaluated with reflex NGS and RT-PCR, so as to compare the results of the two methods. We retrospectively included and collected data from patients with resected EGFR-mutant NS-NSCLC diagnosed in our institution between 2005 and 2024. Additional cases from another center were included. Tumors were analyzed using targeted NGS and RT-PCR. A total of 153 patients were selected. The median follow-up after surgery was 22 months. The positive percent agreement of RT-PCR compared to NGS for the detection of an EGFR mutation was 88%. Common single EGFR mutations (L858R/del19) were observed in 117/153 (77%) cases; 22/153 (14%) and 14/153 (9%) cases had uncommon single and compound EGFR mutations, respectively. 63/153 (41%) patients had a co-occurring mutation, including a TP53 mutation in 43/63 (68%) co-mutated patients. EGFR/TP53-mutant tumors were associated with positive PD-L1 expression compared to EGFR-mutant/TP53-wild-type tumors (62% vs 39%; p = 0.006). Shorter median event-free survival (EFS) in patients with an EGFR exon 18 mutation and those with TP53 exon 7 co-mutation was recorded. The EGFR status should be systematically evaluated using targeted NGS reflex testing for resected NS-NSCLC since future therapeutic decision-making could soon consider integrating the presence of co-occurring mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39741211What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.