ArticleMaternal and child health journal2025
A Needs Assessment of Labor and Delivery Nurses Performing NRP in the Delivery Room.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLabor and delivery (L&D) nurses are often responsible for initiating the critical first steps of the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP). Identification of knowledge gaps and underlying reasons for NRP non-adherence is crucial for designing educational interventions.
methodsA convenience sample of 37 L&D nurses from two delivery hospitals were enrolled. Participants completed a Likert scale survey capturing years of experience and comfort level in performing neonatal resuscitation followed by a video recorded standardized manikin-based simulation of a neonatal resuscitation. NRP adherence was assessed using an Observed Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) assessment tool with prior validity evidence. Percentage of correctly completed OSCE items, median time to initiation of positive pressure ventilation (PPV), and achievement of effective PPV were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
resultsParticipants reported a median of 2.5 years of L&D experience, and a 4/6 confidence level for performing NRP. Fifty-seven percent of items (12/21) items were correctly completed. Participants took 55 s to initiate PPV with 57% initiating PPV within the target of 60 s. The time to effective PPV was 109 s, with 32% of participants achieving this within 60 s. Years of L&D experience had a strong correlation with percentage of correctly completed OSCE items (r = 0.63). DISCUSSION: Despite high self-perceived confidence, initiating and achieving effective PPV within the 60 s time window mandated by NRP remains an area for significant improvement for L&D nurses. Next steps include the design and implementation of targeted training to address performance gaps and longer-term tracking for retention of knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39741207What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.