Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39741192›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2025

Simulation training with haptic feedback of instrument vibrations reduces resident workload during live robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy.

Ernest D Gomez, Haliza Mat Husin, Kristoffel R Dumon, Noel N Williams, Katherine J Kuchenbecker

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ernest D Gomez *Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3765-5492
Haliza Mat Husin *Haptic Intelligence Department, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Heisenbergstraße 3, 70569, Stuttgart, Germany.
Kristoffel R DumonDepartment of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Noel N WilliamsDepartment of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Katherine J KuchenbeckerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. kjk@is.mpg.de.

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardTL1TR000138 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2012 to 2015
$877k
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft No Award NumberNational Science Foundation CAREER Award (#IIS-0845670)NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000138NCATS NIH HHS TL1TR000138Wallace H. Coulter Foundation No Award Number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew surgeons experience heavy workload during robot-assisted surgery partially because they must use vision to compensate for the lack of haptic feedback. We hypothesize that providing realistic haptic feedback during dry-lab simulation training may accelerate learning and reduce workload during subsequent surgery on patients.

methodsWe conducted a single-blinded study with 12 general surgery residents (third and seventh post-graduate year, PGY) randomized into haptic and control groups. Participants performed five simulated bariatric surgeries on a custom inanimate simulator followed by live robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomies (RASGs) using da Vinci robots. The haptic group received naturalistic haptic feedback of instrument vibrations during their first four simulated procedures. Participants completed pre-/post-procedure STAI and post-procedure NASA-TLX questionnaires in both simulation and the operating room (OR).

resultsHigher PGY level (simulation: p < 0.001, OR p = 0.004), shorter operative time (simulation: p < 0.001, OR p = 0.003), and lower pre-procedure STAI (simulation: p = 0.003, OR p < 0.001) were significantly associated with lower self-reported overall workload in both operative settings; PGY-7 s reported about 10% lower workload than PGY-3 s. The haptic group had significantly lower overall covariate-adjusted NASA-TLX during the fourth (p = 0.03) and fifth (p = 0.04) simulated procedures and across all OR procedures (p = 0.047), though not for only the first three OR procedures. Haptic feedback reduced physical demand (simulation: p < 0.001, OR p = 0.001) and increased perceived performance (simulation: p = 0.031, OR p < 0.001) in both settings.

conclusionHaptic feedback of instrument vibrations provided during robotic surgical simulation reduces trainee workload during both simulation and live OR cases. The implications of workload reduction and its potential effects on patient safety warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastrectomyInternship and ResidencyRobotic Surgical ProceduresSimulation TrainingWorkloadAdultClinical CompetenceFeedbackFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleOperative TimeSingle-Blind MethodVibrationHaptic feedbackNASA-TLXNaturalistic vibrotactile feedbackRobotic surgerySubjective workload assessmentSurgical simulation

Identifiers

PMID39741192
PMCPMC11870985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.