ArticleScientific reports2024
Self-supervised denoising of grating-based phase-contrast computed tomography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing synchrotron radiation micro-CT images using deep learning: an application of Noise2Inverse on bone imaging.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last decade, grating-based phase-contrast computed tomography (gbPC-CT) has received growing interest. It provides additional information about the refractive index decrement in the sample. This signal shows an increased soft-tissue contrast. However, the resolution dependence of the signal poses a challenge: its contrast enhancement is overcompensated by the low resolution in low-dose applications such as clinical computed tomography. As a result, the implementation of gbPC-CT is currently tied to a higher dose. To reduce the dose, we introduce the self-supervised deep learning network Noise2Inverse into the field of gbPC-CT. We evaluate the behavior of the Noise2Inverse parameters on the phase-contrast results. Afterward, we compare its results with other denoising methods, namely the Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, Block Matching 3D, and Patchwise Phase Retrieval. In the example of Noise2Inverse, we show that deep learning networks can deliver superior denoising results with respect to the investigated image quality metrics. Their application allows to increase the resolution while maintaining the dose. At higher resolutions, gbPC-CT can naturally deliver higher contrast than conventional absorption-based CT. Therefore, the application of machine learning-based denoisers shifts the dose-normalized image quality in favor of gbPC-CT, bringing it one step closer to medical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.