Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39741166›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Self-supervised denoising of grating-based phase-contrast computed tomography.

Sami Wirtensohn, Clemens Schmid, Daniel Berthe, Dominik John, Lisa Heck, Kirsten Taphorn, Silja Flenner, Julia Herzen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sami WirtensohnResearch Group Biomedical Imaging Physics, Department of Physics, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany. sami.wirtensohn@tum.de.
Clemens SchmidChair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Daniel BertheChair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Dominik JohnResearch Group Biomedical Imaging Physics, Department of Physics, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Lisa HeckChair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Kirsten TaphornChair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Silja FlennerInstitute of Materials Physics, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany.
Julia HerzenResearch Group Biomedical Imaging Physics, Department of Physics, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, grating-based phase-contrast computed tomography (gbPC-CT) has received growing interest. It provides additional information about the refractive index decrement in the sample. This signal shows an increased soft-tissue contrast. However, the resolution dependence of the signal poses a challenge: its contrast enhancement is overcompensated by the low resolution in low-dose applications such as clinical computed tomography. As a result, the implementation of gbPC-CT is currently tied to a higher dose. To reduce the dose, we introduce the self-supervised deep learning network Noise2Inverse into the field of gbPC-CT. We evaluate the behavior of the Noise2Inverse parameters on the phase-contrast results. Afterward, we compare its results with other denoising methods, namely the Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, Block Matching 3D, and Patchwise Phase Retrieval. In the example of Noise2Inverse, we show that deep learning networks can deliver superior denoising results with respect to the investigated image quality metrics. Their application allows to increase the resolution while maintaining the dose. At higher resolutions, gbPC-CT can naturally deliver higher contrast than conventional absorption-based CT. Therefore, the application of machine learning-based denoisers shifts the dose-normalized image quality in favor of gbPC-CT, bringing it one step closer to medical application.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyNoise reductionPhase contrastSelf-supervised learningX-ray imaging

Identifiers

PMID39741166
PMCPMC11688505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.