ArticleScientific reports2024
Leveraging AHP and transfer learning in machine learning for improved prediction of infectious disease outbreaks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging ensemble model and public health practice: an approach for refining understanding of seasonal dengue transmission patterns in Bangladesh.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Global approaches to infectious disease surveillance and modeling.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- Climate-Driven Advanced Machine Learning Approach for Dengue Incidence Forecasting in Bangladesh.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Proof-of-Concept Machine Learning Framework for Arboviral Disease Classification Using Literature-Derived Synthetic Data: Methodological Development Preceding Clinical Validation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infectious diseases significantly impact both public health and economic stability, underscoring the critical need for precise outbreak predictions to effictively mitigate their impact. This study applies advanced machine learning techniques to forecast outbreaks of Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika, utilizing a comprehensive dataset comprising climate and socioeconomic data. Spanning the years 2007 to 2017, the dataset includes 1716 instances characterized by 27 distinct features. The researchers adopt the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for feature selection and integrated transfer learning to boost the accuracy of the study's predictions. The researchers' approach involves the deployment of several machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting, and an ensemble of these methods. The result reveals that the ensemble model is particularly effective, achieving the highest accuracy rate of 96.80% and an AUC of 0.9197 for predicting Zika outbreaks. Furthermore, it exhibts consistent performance across various metrics. Notably, in the context of Chikungunya, this model achieves an optimal balance between precision and recall, with an accuracy of 93.31%, a precision of 57%, and a recall of 63%, highlighting its reliability for effective outbreak prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.