ArticleMacromolecular bioscience2025
A Comparative Study between Thiol-Ene and Acrylate Photocrosslinkable Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel Inks for Digital Light Processing.
Article in Macromolecular bioscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell-Friendly Indirect 3D Printing Strategy for Scaffold Fabrication.Macromolecular rapid communications · 2026Article
- Glycosaminoglycan-functionalized hydrogels for sustained delivery of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 mediating matrix metalloprotease inhibition and extracellular matrix stabilization.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Network Formation Dynamics in Thiol-ene Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels: Design Principles for In Vitro Tissue Models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Hydrogel Network Architecture Design Space: Impact on Mechanical and Viscoelastic Properties.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Hyaluronic Acid: Production Strategies, Gel-Forming Properties, and Advances in Drug Delivery Systems.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Light-activated decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioinks for enhanced mechanical integrity.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- A Comparative Study between Thiol-Ene and Acrylate Photocrosslinkable Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel Inks for Digital Light Processing.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Photocrosslinkable formulations based on the radical thiol-ene reaction are considered better alternatives than methacrylated counterparts for light-based fabrication processes. This study quantifies differences between thiol-ene and methacrylated crosslinked hydrogels in terms of precursors stability, the control of the crosslinking process, and the resolution of printed features particularized for hyaluronic acid (HA) inks at concentrations relevant for bioprinting. First, the synthesis of HA functionalized with norbornene, allyl ether, or methacrylate groups with the same molecular weight and comparable degrees of functionalization is presented. The thiol-ene hydrogel precursors show storage stability over 15 months, 3.8 times higher than the methacrylated derivative. Photorheology experiments demonstrate up to 4.7-times faster photocrosslinking. Network formation in photoinitiated thiol-ene HA crosslinking allows higher temporal control than in methacrylated HA, which shows long post-illumination hardening. Using digital light processing, 4% w/v HA hydrogels crosslinked with a dithiol allowed printing of 13.5 × 4 × 1 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.