SynthesisInternational dental journal2025
Bioengineering Innovations in Global Dental Infection Control: Applications and Adaptations in Clinical Settings.
Synthesis in International dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Biomonitoring of Occupational Exposure to Mercury Among Dental Health Workers in LMICs: A Systematic Review.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimsDental practices pose a high risk of microbial contamination due to frequent exposure to bodily fluids like saliva and blood. Bioengineering innovations have emerged as vital tools to enhance infection control in dental settings. This review aims to assess the global applications and effectiveness of these innovations, particularly focusing on antimicrobial biomaterials, sterilization techniques, and personal protective equipment (PPE).
methodsA systematic review was conducted across major databases to identify studies from 2000 to 2024 that examined bioengineering technologies used in dental infection control. Inclusion criteria included studies focusing on antimicrobial materials, PPE, or novel sterilization technologies. Data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines, focusing on study design, dental settings, and clinical outcomes related to infection control.
resultsNine studies met the inclusion criteria, covering diverse geographical regions, including Italy, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, and India. Antimicrobial agents like silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles, UV-C sterilization, and low-temperature plasma were found to significantly reduce microbial contamination. The pooled effect size across studies was 1.62 (95% CI: 1.41-1.82) with low heterogeneity (I² = 6.4%). However, barriers such as high costs and limited resource availability were highlighted, particularly in lower-income regions.
conclusionBioengineering innovations show significant potential for enhancing infection control in dental settings worldwide. While the technologies offer improved safety and hygiene, challenges related to cost and accessibility persist. Further research is needed to explore cost-effective and scalable solutions, particularly in resource-limited settings. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The integration of bioengineering technologies in dental practices can significantly improve infection control measures, reducing microbial contamination and enhancing safety for both patients and healthcare workers. These innovations hold promise for global adaptation, particularly in response to emerging public health challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.