ArticleSexually transmitted infections2025
Application of the COM-B model to facilitators and barriers to HIV and STI testing among people from Black African and Black Caribbean communities in the UK: a scoping review.
Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers to and facilitators of adherence to evidence-based standard antimicrobial treatment guidelines among physicians in Ethiopia: a formative qualitative study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Inequities in willingness to disclose contact information to access free mpox self-testing kits among MSM in China: a COM-B-informed multi-center study.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Co-producing sexual health services with minoritised communities: learning from a longitudinal qualitative evaluation.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators to HIV testing among transgender people in Georgia: Qualitative study results using the COM-B Framework.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to HIV and Viral Hepatitis Testing in Primary Health Care Settings in the Kyrgyz Republic (BarTest): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIndividuals from Black African and Black Caribbean communities (black communities) in the UK bear a disproportionate burden of HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), while exhibiting lower testing rates. The aim of the scoping review was to summarise interventions developed to increase HIV/STI testing among black communities in the UK and describe the facilitators and barriers that influence testing uptake in these populations, according to the Capability Opportunity Motivation Behaviour (COM-B) approach.
methodsSix databases were systematically searched to identify quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method studies evaluating the effectiveness of HIV/STI testing interventions among black communities in the UK, published from 2000 onwards. The review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute Framework of Evidence Synthesis and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, and the factors were mapped onto the COM-B model components.
resultsTwenty-two studies, of which 11 were available as abstracts only, were included. Twelve studies included testing provision and health promotion, six studies testing provision only and four health promotion only. Nineteen studies looked at HIV testing interventions only. Facilitators to testing included interventions that provided an understanding of STI and HIV risk, assured privacy for testers and normalised testing through integration into existing services and delivery in non-traditional settings by appropriately trained staff. Barriers to testing included interventions that were stigmatising through the choice of intervention settings and/or targeting of groups, low perceived risk and limited knowledge about infections among people from black communities, and limited engagement and partnership working with relevant community organisations and groups.
conclusionMultifaceted interventions that include health promotion and opportunities for testing, co-designed with and by local communities, are crucial in addressing the range of barriers and facilitators experienced by people from black communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.