Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39740951›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Pharmacy Integrated Transitions (PIT) trial: a protocol for a pragmatic cluster-randomised crossover trial.

Mariam N Hantouli, Sarah E Monsell, Giana H Davidson, Jocelyn Chaing, Bryan Comstock, Arzu Ahmed Dervish, Nick J Gionet, Shalynn Howard, Nathalia Jimenez, Catherine Kim and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05241951 (Preventing Medication-Related Problems in Care Transitions to Skilled Nursing Facilities Using a Pharmacy Integrated Transitional Team), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05241951 nacompletednot on this map

Preventing Medication-Related Problems in Care Transitions to Skilled Nursing Facilities Using a Pharmacy Integrated Transitional Team

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2022 to 2025Enrolled1,052ConditionsCare TransitionArmsStructured hand-off, Medication reconciliation during transitional period, Transitional medication monitoring, Teleconsultation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Mariam N HantouliUniversity of Washington Department of Surgery, Seattle, Washington, USA hantouli@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2786-2757
Sarah E MonsellDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Giana H DavidsonUniversity of Washington Department of Surgery, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jocelyn ChaingUniversity of Washington Department of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Bryan ComstockDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Arzu Ahmed DervishUniversity of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Nick J GionetUniversity of Washington Department of Surgery, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Shalynn HowardUniversity of Washington Department of Surgery, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Nathalia JimenezUniversity of Washington Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Catherine KimUniversity of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Miriam LibermanUniversity of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Edwin G LindoUniversity of Washington Department of Family Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Zachary A MarcumUniversity of Washington Department of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Thuan D OngDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Elina SerranoUniversity of Washington Department of Surgery, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Katherine SimonsUniversity of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Lydia S SunUniversity of Washington Department of Pharmacy, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Oleg ZaslavskyUniversity of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Elizabeth AustinHealth Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
PIT Collaborative

Funding

PILOT STUDY--CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCHP30DK035816 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Ellen A Schur · 1986 to 2026
$30.4M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS027805NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK035816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIneffective coordination during care transitions from hospitals to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) costs Medicare US$2.8-US$3.4 billion annually and results in avoidable adverse events. Approximately 70% of patients experience medication errors during these transitions, resulting in downstream consequences such as medication-related problems and unplanned readmissions. Patients and caregivers report significant emotional distress and concerns, particularly regarding medication management. Current protocols often fail to ensure effective medication management and communication between hospital and SNF teams. Developed with input from multiple interest holders, the Pharmacy Integrated Transitions (PIT) programme enhances these transitions by improving medication safety and communication. The programme includes a pharmacist who reconciles patients' medications during transitions from hospitals to SNFs, and a structured handoff between hospital and SNF clinical teams. A rigorous, pragmatic trial is needed to assess the programme's effectiveness in enhancing care transitions compared with standard practices.The PIT trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the PIT programme in improving patients' care transitions from hospitals to SNFs compared with usual care, and to characterise multiple interest holders' perspectives on its implementation fidelity, effectiveness and needed support for sustainment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PIT trial is a parallel cluster-randomised controlled crossover trial design, with randomisation occurring at the SNF cluster level. The trial is conducted across 4 hospitals and 14 independent SNFs in Washington State. SNFs are stratified by patient volume before being randomly assigned to either the PIT programme or usual care. The trial aims to include a diverse patient population transitioning from hospitals to SNFs. The primary outcome is medication-related problems within 30 days posthospital discharge. Clinical adverse events, readmission rates and emergency department visits will be compared. Additionally, we will conduct a mixed-methods summative evaluation to assess multiple interest holders' perspectives on the PIT programme's implementation fidelity, effectiveness and the support required for its sustainment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial was approved by the University of Washington's Human Subjects Division on 9 September 2020 (STUDY00011018_PIT). The trial was reviewed by the University of Washington Institutional Review Board (IRB) and was issued a waiver of consent. The University of Washington serves as the IRB for all 14 of the Post Acute Care Skilled Nursing Facility study sites. Results from this trial will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Results may also be presented at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05241951.

Indexed as

Cross-Over StudiesSkilled Nursing FacilitiesContinuity of Patient CareHumansMedication ErrorsMedication ReconciliationPatient DischargePatient TransferPharmacy Service, HospitalPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicUnited StatesAdverse eventsClinical TrialHealth ServicesMedication ReconciliationMedication Review

Identifiers

PMID39740951
PMCPMC11749757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.