Observational studyBMJ open2024
Comparison of neurological outcomes between out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to anaphylaxis and cardiac causes: a nationwide population-based observational study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the neurological outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to anaphylaxis (OHCA-A) and cardiac causes (OHCA-C).
designRetrospective observational study.
settingJapanese nationwide dataset from 2012 to 2021.
participantsIn total, 153 890 patients were included in this study, of which 331 had OHCA-A and 153 559 had OHCA-C. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a favourable neurological outcome 1 month after cardiac arrest. The secondary outcome was survival at 1 month.
resultsPatients with OHCA-A had a significantly higher favourable neurological outcome rate (24.2% vs 11.7%, p<0.001) and higher survival rate at 1 month (33.2% vs 16.1%, p<0.001) than patients with OHCA-C. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that OHCA-A was associated with higher odds of favourable neurological outcomes (adjusted OR (adj OR): 1.86; 95% CI 1.34 to 2.59) and survival at 1 month (adj OR: 2.43; 95% CI 1.78 to 3.31). Similarly, the propensity score-matched cohort showed favourable neurological outcomes in patients with OHCA-A (OR: 2.91; 95% CI 1.83 to 4.65).
conclusionCompared with OHCA-C, OHCA-A is associated with favourable neurological outcomes and warrants more aggressive resuscitation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.