Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39740939›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Scoping review of social workers' professional roles in primary care.

Rachelle Ashcroft, Peter Sheffield, Keith Adamson, Fred Phelps, Glenda Webber, Benjamin Walsh, Louis-François Dallaire, Deepy Sur, Connor Kemp, Jennifer Rayner and 2 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rachelle AshcroftFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada rachelle.ashcroft@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5666-1946
Peter SheffieldFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1869-5035
Keith AdamsonFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Fred PhelpsCanadian Association of Social Workers, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Glenda WebberCanadian Association of Social Workers, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Benjamin WalshUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Louis-François DallaireDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Deepy SurOntario Association of Social Workers, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Connor KempLennox and Addington Ontario Health Team, Frontenac, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer RaynerAlliance for Healthier Communities, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Simon LamFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Judith Belle BrownDepartment of Family Medicine, Western University Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, London, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMaximising social workers' contributions to primary care requires clarity about their scope of practice in this context. This scoping review sought to clarify what is known about social work's scope of practice in primary care settings.

designA scoping review design guided by the five-stage scoping review framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley and the updated JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. DATA SOURCES: 204 articles, published between 2013 and 2023 and obtained from the following seven databases, were reviewed: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Social Work Abstracts, Social Services Abstracts, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts and Scopus. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Peer-reviewed articles that included a focus on social work and primary care, written in English, published between 2013 and 2023 and not restricted by geographical location. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Social workers' scope of practice in primary care was assessed in terms of role; health conditions, patient populations, social issues addressed; location of practice and modality for care delivery; range of providers that social workers collaborate and methods of collaboration.

resultsResults indicate that primary care social workers advance comprehensive, patient-centred, continuity of care and benefit both patients and other providers within primary care teams. Social workers undertake a range of roles, activities and functions in primary care settings-spanning direct patient care, team processes and community engagement. Social workers in primary care are involved in supporting patients with a robust range of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental conditions, as well as other acute and chronic health conditions. Most social workers are physically co-located within a team and are collaborating with a wide range of providers within and outside of the team.

conclusionsThis scoping review contributes clarity about social work's capacity for enhancing the delivery of primary care. Social work's role in primary care facilitates comprehensive, continuous and patient-centred care that improves the experiences of both patients and teams. Social work clinicians, leaders and scholars are encouraged to seek out opportunities to participate in and undertake research identifying these contributions to primary care.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareProfessional RoleSocial WorkersHumansPatient-Centered CareSocial WorkHealth ServicesPrimary CarePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID39740939
PMCPMC11749816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.