Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39740780›Full record

SynthesisBrain and behavior2025

Efficacy of Duloxetine for Postspine Surgery Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abdulsalam Mohammed Aleid, Faisal Alshehri, Naif Alasiri, Fatimah Alhomoud, Shouq Alsaegh, Mohammed Alrasheed, Salem Aljaddua, Ali Alasiri, Asma Boukhari, Abdulmonem Ali Alhussain and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Acupuncture for postoperative rehabilitation in degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: mechanisms and clinical evidence.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Abdulsalam Mohammed AleidDepartment of Surgery, Medical College, King Faisal University, Hofuf, Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal AlshehriDepartment of surgery, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Naif AlasiriDepartment of surgery, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Fatimah AlhomoudDepartment of surgery, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Shouq AlsaeghDepartment of surgery, Qassim University, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlrasheedDepartment of surgery, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Salem AljadduaDepartment of surgery, Jouf University, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia.
Ali AlasiriDepartment of surgery, Rijal Almaa General Hospital, Rijal Almaa, Saudi Arabia.
Asma BoukhariDepartment of surgery, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulmonem Ali AlhussainDepartment of Neurosurgery, King Fahad Hospital, Hofuf, Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Bipin ChaurasiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Clinic, Birgunj, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8392-2072
Saud Nayef AldanyowiDepartment of Surgery, Medical College, King Faisal University, Hofuf, Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3559-3307

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuloxetine, a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), is used to treat various health conditions, including major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, fibromyalgia, and off-label for chemotherapy-induced pain. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to test the current evidence regarding effectiveness and safety of duloxetine for postspine surgeries pain.

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Scopus and Web of science databases for relevant articles up to March 2024. The following search terms were Used in combination using the Boolean operators ((Duloxetine Hydrochloride) AND ((Pain, Postoperative) OR (Postoperative Period) OR (Postoperative Cognitive Complications) OR (Delayed Emergence from Anesthesia) OR (Postoperative Care) OR (spine surgery)) without time constrain for the search. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan version 5.4) on the extracted outcome data that present in at least 3 of the included studies. Mean difference (MD) was used as the effect size for continuous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval (CI) or standardized mean difference (SMD) in case of different outcome reporting scales.

resultsPooled analysis showed that duloxetine significantly reduces pain intensity after 24 h from the operation compared to placebo (SMD = -1.11, 95% CI [-2.16 to -0.07], p = 0.04) with no significant difference in pain after 2 and 48 h. Meta-analysis revealed that duloxetine shows a significant reduction in the amount of analgesic consumption after 24 h postoperative; (MD = -3.33, 95% CI [-5.53 to -1.13], p = 0.003). The analysis did not show any statistically significant difference between duloxetine and placebo in patients experiencing nausea or vomiting (RR = 1.37, 95% CI [0.62 to 3.00]

conclusionThe findings of this study suggest that duloxetine may be effective in reducing pain 24 h after spine surgery. Furthermore, there is a promising effect of duloxetine in treating chronic postoperative pain. However, it is important to acknowledge that further research is warranted to thoroughly evaluate the efficacy and safety of duloxetine for relieving chronic postoperative pain.

Indexed as

Duloxetine HydrochloridePostoperative PainAnalgesicsHumansSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake InhibitorsAnalgesicsDuloxetine HydrochlorideSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitorsduloxetinepainspinesurgery

Identifiers

PMID39740780
PMCPMC11688044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.