Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39740776›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2025

Diagnosis of Schizophrenia and Its Subtypes Using MRI and Machine Learning.

Hosna Tavakoli, Reza Rostami, Reza Shalbaf, Mohammad-Reza Nazem-Zadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hosna TavakoliComputational and Artificial Intelligence Department, Institute of Cognitive Science Studies, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9129-087X
Reza RostamiComputational and Artificial Intelligence Department, Institute of Cognitive Science Studies, Tehran, Iran.
Reza ShalbafComputational and Artificial Intelligence Department, Institute of Cognitive Science Studies, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad-Reza Nazem-ZadehComputational and Artificial Intelligence Department, Institute of Cognitive Science Studies, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

Strategic Technologies Development of National Elite Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe neurobiological heterogeneity present in schizophrenia remains poorly understood. This likely contributes to the limited success of existing treatments and the observed variability in treatment responses. Our objective was to employ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms to improve the classification of schizophrenia and its subtypes.

methodWe utilized a public dataset provided by the UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Research, containing structural MRI and resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI) data. We integrated all individuals within the dataset diagnosed with schizophrenia (N = 50), along with age- and gender-matched healthy individuals (N = 50). We extracted volumetrics of 66 subcortical and thickness of 72 cortical regions. Additionally, we obtained four graph-based measures for 116 intracranial regions from rsfMRI data, including degree, betweenness centrality, participation coefficient, and local efficiency. Employing conventional ML methods, we sought to distinguish the patients with schizophrenia from healthy individuals. Furthermore, we applied the methods for discriminating subtypes of schizophrenia. To streamline the feature set, various feature selection techniques were applied. Moreover, a validation phase involved employing the model on a dataset domestically acquired using the same imaging assessments (N = 13). Finally, we explored the correlation between neuroimaging features and behavioral assessments. FINDING: The classification accuracy reached as high as 79% in distinguishing schizophrenia patients from healthy in the UCLA dataset. This result was achieved by the k-nearest neighbor algorithm, utilizing 12 brain neuroimaging features, selected by the feature selection method of minimum redundancy maximum relevance (MRMR). The model demonstrated effectiveness (72% accuracy) in estimating the patient's label for a new dataset acquired domestically. Using a linear support vector machine (SVM) on 62 features obtained from MRMR, patients with schizophrenic subtypes were classified with an accuracy of 64%. The highest Spearman correlation coefficient between the neuroimaging features and behavioral assessments was observed between the degree of the postcentral gyrus and mean reaction time in the verbal capacity task (r = 0.49, p = 0.001).

conclusionThe findings of this study underscore the utility of MRI and ML algorithms in enhancing the diagnostic process for schizophrenia. Furthermore, these methods hold promise for detecting both brain-related abnormalities and cognitive impairments associated with this disorder.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingSchizophreniaAdultBrainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultdisease subtypesfunctional MRI (fMRI)graph theorymachine learning (ML)magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)psychiatric disorder diagnosisresting‐state fMRIschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID39740776
PMCPMC11688118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.