ReviewLife sciences2025
Progesterone signaling in uterine fibroids: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.
Review in Life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The estrogen-progestogen-oxidative stress network in uterine fibroids: mechanistic insights and therapeutic opportunities.Redox report : communications in free radical research · 2026Review
- Comparative transcriptomic analysis of endometrial tissue associated with uterine fibroids and endometrial polyps.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Obesity/Overweight as a Meaningful Modifier of Associations Between Gene Polymorphisms Affecting the Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin Content and Uterine Myoma.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessment of Hepatic Safety of Ulipristal Acetate in Korean Women with Uterine Fibroids: A Real-World Study Using Biochemical Markers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A systems-based approach to uterine fibroids identifies differential splicing associated with abnormal uterine bleeding.Communications medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Progesterone (P4) is a vital female sex hormone involved in various physiological processes, including the maintenance of the endometrium, mammary gland development, and bone health. Beyond its reproductive roles, P4 is implicated in the pathogenesis of hormone-dependent conditions like uterine fibroids, the most common benign tumors in women, which can severely affect quality of life and fertility. Traditionally, estrogen was considered the primary driver of fibroid growth, but recent research highlights the significant role of P4 in fibroid growth. P4 interacts with progesterone receptors (PRs) and non-genomic membrane receptors (mPRs and PGRMCs) to activate signaling pathways that enhance tumor growth and survival. P4 promotes vascular changes that improve the blood supply to fibroids and modifies the extracellular matrix, a key component of fibroid structure. This understanding has led to the investigation of selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) as potential therapies for fibroids. Clinical trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of SPRMs like mifepristone, asoprisnil, and ulipristal acetate in reducing fibroid size and symptoms, though concerns about safety, particularly with long-term use, remain. Newer SPRMs, such as vilaprisan, show promise, but further research is necessary to assess the long-term safety and effectiveness. This review discusses the mechanisms by which progesterone contributes to fibroid growth and examines clinical effectiveness of SPRMs as potential treatments for uterine fibroids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.