Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39740652›Full record

ReviewApplied ergonomics2025

The role of patient ergonomics in improving health research participation.

Teresa Zayas-Cabán, Courtney C Rogers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied ergonomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Teresa Zayas-CabánNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, BG 38A RM 4S415, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA. Electronic address: Teresa.ZayasCaban@nih.gov.
Courtney C RogersUniversity of Virginia, Department of Systems and Information Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Olsson Hall, 151 Engineer's Way, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA. Electronic address: ccr9sc@virginia.edu.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 LM999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient ergonomics advances understanding of patient work to support individuals in managing health and health care, which can be expanded to include health research. While health research enables improvements in care delivery and health outcomes, participant recruitment, enrollment, and retention challenges hamper effective research participation, impede success of research studies, and influence the validity and generalizability of findings. Recent trends in health research create new opportunities to engage patients in research but require careful attention to patient ergonomics and human factors considerations to ensure they successfully address participant needs and contexts. This article describes the research participation process and related patient ergonomics considerations, summarizes patient ergonomic factors identified in the literature that influence participation, discusses how patient ergonomics can be expanded to understand and address challenges to health research participation using two exemplar research programs, and identifies opportunities to include health research participation as part of patient ergonomics.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsPatient ParticipationHumansPatient SelectionResearch DesignHealth researchPatient ergonomicsResearch participation

Identifiers

PMID39740652
PMCPMC11912007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.