ArticleJMIR medical informatics2024
Enhancing Clinical Decision Making by Predicting Readmission Risk in Patients With Heart Failure Using Machine Learning: Predictive Model Development Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: An Umbrella Review of Applications and Translational Challenges.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Pooled it
- Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for risk stratification in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism: retrospective study.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- A multidimensional risk prediction framework for malignant intestinal obstruction based on machine learning: computational model development and clinical validation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Identification of Enzalutamide-Related Genes for Prognosis and Immunotherapy in Prostate Adenocarcinoma.Human mutation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with heart failure frequently face the possibility of rehospitalization following an initial hospital stay, placing a significant burden on both patients and health care systems. Accurate predictive tools are crucial for guiding clinical decision-making and optimizing patient care. However, the effectiveness of existing models tailored specifically to the Chinese population is still limited. Objective: This study aimed to formulate a predictive model for assessing the likelihood of readmission among patients diagnosed with heart failure. Methods: In this study, we analyzed data from 1948 patients with heart failure in a hospital in Sichuan Province between 2016 and 2019. By applying 3 variable selection strategies, 29 relevant variables were identified. Subsequently, we constructed 6 predictive models using different algorithms: logistic regression, support vector machine, gradient boosting machine, Extreme Gradient Boosting, multilayer perception, and graph convolutional networks. Results: The graph convolutional network model showed the highest prediction accuracy with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.831, accuracy of 75%, sensitivity of 52.12%, and specificity of 90.25%. Conclusions: The model crafted in this study proves its effectiveness in forecasting the likelihood of readmission among patients with heart failure, thus serving as a crucial reference for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.