ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2025
Bridging theory and practice: Experiences of diagnostic radiography students during clinical training in resource-constrained settings.
Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A structured blended learning approach for medical imaging technology interns: a prospective randomized comparative study.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Teaching radiology in undergraduate programmes in medical schools in francophone sub-Saharan Africa : a multicenter survey.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClinical training is crucial for diagnostic radiography students, bridging theoretical knowledge with practical skills. In resource-constrained settings, this training may face unique challenges that might significantly impact learning outcomes and future practice. Despite its importance, the experiences of diagnostic radiography students during clinical placements remain understudied, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to explore and describe the experiences of diagnostic radiography students during clinical training at two resource-constrained Sub-Saharan public hospitals.
methodsA qualitative phenomenological study was conducted using face-to-face, semi-structured interviews with 18 diagnostic radiography students (six each from years 2 to 4) from one participating university. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Trustworthiness was ensured through prolonged engagement, member checking, and researchers' reflexivity. Ethical approval was obtained before data collection commenced.
resultsThree main themes were generated: (1) Clinical Environment Challenges, including equipment shortages and understaffing; (2) Independent Learning and Development, highlighting students' resilience and self-directed learning; and (3) Patient Care Impact, demonstrating students' commitment to quality care despite constraints. Students reported increased confidence and adaptability but also noted negative interactions with healthcare workers and supervision inconsistencies.
conclusionsDespite significant challenges, diagnostic radiography students demonstrated remarkable resilience and commitment to patient care. However, resource limitations and interprofessional issues pose substantial barriers to optimal learning experiences. These findings highlighted the need for targeted interventions in diagnostic radiography education within resource-constrained settings, including increased investment in equipment and staffing, enhanced interprofessional education, improved supervision models and curriculum enhancements fostering self-directed learning and resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.