Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39740049›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2024

The relationship between channel interaction, electrode placement, and speech perception in adult cochlear implant users.

Katelyn Berg, Ray Goldsworthy, Jack Noble, Benoit Dawant, René Gifford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katelyn BergVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4455-3566
Ray GoldsworthyUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3781-5468
Jack NobleVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0973-505X
Benoit DawantVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3804-8400
René GiffordVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6662-3436

Funding

Model-based Cochlear Implant ProgrammingR01DC014037 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI NOBLE, JACK · 2014 to 2024
$5.0M
Encoding Temporal Fine Structure for Cochlear ImplantsR01DC018044 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI RAYMOND L GOLDSWORTHY · 2020 to 2026
$3.7M
Cochlear Implants: Combined Electric and Binaural Acoustic StimulationR01DC009404 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GIFFORD, RENE H · 2010 to 2019
$3.4M
Computer-assisted, image-guided programming of Cochlear ImplantsR01DC014462 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAWANT, BENOIT M. · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
Music Appreciation after Cochlear ImplantationR01DC018701 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI GOLDSWORTHY, RAYMOND L · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
Optimizing cochlear implants for music perceptionF32DC020347 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERG, KATELYN · 2022 to 2024
$218k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC020347NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009404NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014037NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014462NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018044NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study (1) characterized the effects of channel interaction using spectral blurring, (2) evaluated an image-guided electrode selection (IGES) method aiming to reduce channel interaction, and (3) investigated the impact of electrode placement factors on the change in performance by condition. Twelve adult MED-EL (Innsbruck, Austria) cochlear implant recipients participated. Performance was compared across six conditions: baseline (no blurring), all blurred, apical blurred, middle blurred, basal blurred, and IGES. Electrode placement information was calculated from post-insertion computerized tomography (CT) imaging. Each condition tested measures of speech recognition and subjective ratings. Results showed poorer performance when spectral blurring was applied to all channels compared to baseline, suggesting an increase in channel interaction was achieved. Vowel recognition was more sensitive to apical and middle blurring while consonant recognition was more sensitive to basal blurring, indicating that phoneme identification may be useful for assessing channel interaction clinically. IGES did not significantly improve group performance, and electrode placement factors did not impact results. However, participants who were more affected by spectral blurring tended to benefit more from IGES. These findings indicate that spectral blurring can help identify areas most affected by channel interaction to help optimize electrode selection.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultAgedAudiometry, SpeechFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesRecognition, PsychologyTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID39740049
PMCPMC11693204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.