ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2024
The relationship between channel interaction, electrode placement, and speech perception in adult cochlear implant users.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Questioning the Usefulness of Stimulation Rate Changes to Optimize Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.Audiology research · 2025Article
- The relationship between channel interaction, electrode placement, and speech perception in adult cochlear implant users.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Evaluating Selective Apical Electrode Deactivation for Improving Cochlear Implant Outcomes.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study (1) characterized the effects of channel interaction using spectral blurring, (2) evaluated an image-guided electrode selection (IGES) method aiming to reduce channel interaction, and (3) investigated the impact of electrode placement factors on the change in performance by condition. Twelve adult MED-EL (Innsbruck, Austria) cochlear implant recipients participated. Performance was compared across six conditions: baseline (no blurring), all blurred, apical blurred, middle blurred, basal blurred, and IGES. Electrode placement information was calculated from post-insertion computerized tomography (CT) imaging. Each condition tested measures of speech recognition and subjective ratings. Results showed poorer performance when spectral blurring was applied to all channels compared to baseline, suggesting an increase in channel interaction was achieved. Vowel recognition was more sensitive to apical and middle blurring while consonant recognition was more sensitive to basal blurring, indicating that phoneme identification may be useful for assessing channel interaction clinically. IGES did not significantly improve group performance, and electrode placement factors did not impact results. However, participants who were more affected by spectral blurring tended to benefit more from IGES. These findings indicate that spectral blurring can help identify areas most affected by channel interaction to help optimize electrode selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.