ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2024
Interaction effects in laryngeal and respiratory control of the voice source and vocal fold contact pressure.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glottal Area Waveform Measurements for Healthy Female and Male Speakers in Typical, High-Frequency, and Soft Phonation.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Observational
- Voice as objective biomarker of stress: association of speech features and cortisol.Acta neuropsychiatrica · 2025Article
- Vocal tract contribution to vocal intensity: Interaction between vocal fold adduction, formant tuning, and fundamental frequency.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal distribution of the intraglottal pressure and vocal fold contact pressure in excised larynges.Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies of laryngeal and respiratory control of the voice source often focus on main effects of individual control parameters but not their interactions. The goal of this study is to systematically identify important interaction effects in laryngeal and respiratory control of the voice source and vocal fold contact pressure in a three-dimensional voice production model. Computational simulations were performed with parametric variations in vocal fold geometry, stiffness, prephonatory glottal gap, and subglottal pressure. The results showed that, while the glottal closure pattern and source spectral shape were dominantly controlled by vocal fold vertical thickness, the prephonatory glottal gap had important effects in thick vocal folds or near phonation onset. Coordinated adjustments in both the prephonatory glottal gap and thickness were required to produce a long duration of the closed phase and strong high-frequency harmonic production. Interaction between subglottal pressure and transverse stiffness was observed in the control of the peak vocal fold contact pressure. The contact pressure was highest in vocal folds with low transverse stiffness when exposed to high subglottal pressure, indicating the importance of maintaining a balance between subglottal pressure and transverse stiffness to minimizing vocal fold injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.