ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2024
Profile analysis in listeners with normal and elevated audiometric thresholds: Behavioral and modeling results.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Profile-analysis experiments measure the ability to discriminate complex sounds based on patterns, or profiles, in their amplitude spectra. Studies of profile analysis have focused on normal-hearing listeners and target frequencies near 1 kHz. To provide more insight into underlying mechanisms, we studied profile analysis over a large target frequency range (0.5-4 kHz) and in listeners with both normal and elevated audiometric thresholds. We found that profile analysis degrades at high frequencies and that the effect of spacing between nearby frequency components differs with frequency. Consistent with prior reports, elevated audiometric thresholds were not associated with impaired performance when stimuli consisted of few distantly spaced frequency components. However, elevated audiometric thresholds were associated with elevated profile-analysis thresholds for stimuli composed of many closely spaced frequency components. Behavioral thresholds from listeners with and without hearing loss were predicted by decoding firing rates from simulated auditory-nerve fibers or simulated modulation-sensitive inferior-colliculus neurons. Although responses from both model stages informed some aspects of the behavioral data, only population decoding of inferior-colliculus responses accounted for the worsening of profile-analysis thresholds at high target frequencies. Collectively, these results suggest that profile analysis involves multiple non-peripheral factors, including multichannel comparisons and midbrain tuning to amplitude modulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.