ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2025
T
Anoosha Pai S, Anthony A Gatti, Marianne S Black, Katherine A Young, Arjun D Desai, Marco Barbieri, Jessica L Asay, Seth L Sherman, Garry E Gold, Feliks Kogan and 2 more
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Anoosha Pai SDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3186-9660
Anthony A GattiDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Marianne S BlackDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Katherine A YoungDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Arjun D DesaiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Marco BarbieriDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8795-1073
Jessica L AsayDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Seth L ShermanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Garry E GoldDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3207-822X
Feliks KoganDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Brian A HargreavesDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Akshay S ChaudhariDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3667-6796
Funding
Rapid MRI for Evaluation of OsteoarthritisR01EB002524 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Akshay Chaudhari, Garry E Gold · 2003 to 2026
$10.1M
TR&D Project 3: OpenSim for PredictionP41EB027060 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Joy P Ku · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
RADX TECH - CERES NANOSCIENCE INC NANOTRAP PARTICLE MANUFACTURING75N92020C00021 · NHLBI · CERES NANOSCIENCES, LLLP · PI DUNLAP, ROSS · 2021 to 2021
$4.0M
Rapid Low-Cost Quantitative 3D MRI and Gait Assessment of the KneeR01AR077604 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HARGREAVES, BRIAN ANDREW · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
Imaging of Joint Response to Physiological Stress with Age, Sex and in OsteoarthritisR01AR079431 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Feliks Kogan · 2022 to 2026
$2.9M
Development of Sodium Fluoride PET-MRI for Quantitative Assessment of Knee OsteoarthritisR01AR074492 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOLD, GARRY E · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
Opportunistic Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Estimation at Abdominal CTs with Robust and Unbiased Deep LearningR01HL167974 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Imon Banerjee, Akshay Chaudhari · 2023 to 2026
backgroundPost-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) often follows anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), leading to early cartilage degradation. Change in mean T PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: Develop and apply 3D T STUDY TYPE: Longitudinal case-control study. SUBJECTS: ACLR and contralateral knees of 15 subjects (9 male/6 female, 37.7 ± 10 years) and right knee of 15 matched controls (9 male/6 female, 37.1 ± 12 years) were scanned at 3 weeks, 3, 9, 18, and 30 months post-ACLR. SEQUENCE: 3 T Quantitative double echo steady state sequence. ASSESSMENT: "T STATISTICAL TESTS: A linear mixed model assessed knee, time, and knee-time interaction effects on each outcome metric (P < 0.05), with effect sizes (η
resultsT
conclusionT LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.