Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39740028›Full record

ReviewHippocampus2025

Visual Exploration and the Primate Hippocampal Formation.

Elizabeth A Buffalo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hippocampus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elizabeth A BuffaloDepartment of Neurobiology and Biophysics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Washington National Primate Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6326-9187

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
Neural circuit theory and trained recurrent network modeling of rapid learningU19NS107609 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BUFFALO, ELIZABETH A · 2018 to 2022
$12.6M
Tracking the emergence of internal modelsUF1NS126485 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BUFFALO, ELIZABETH A, FAIRHALL, ADRIENNE L · 2022 to 2022
$6.2M
NIH HHS P51 OD010425NIH HHS P51OD010425NIH HHS U19NS107609NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS107609NINDS NIH HHS UF1 NS126485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the 1990s and early 2000s, research in humans and in the nonhuman primate model of human amnesia revealed that tasks involving free viewing of images provided an exceptionally sensitive measure of recognition memory. Performance on these tasks was sensitive to damage restricted to the hippocampus as well as to damage that included medial temporal lobe cortices. Early work in my laboratory used free-viewing tasks to assess the neurophysiological correlates of recognition memory, and the use of naturalistic visual exploration opened rich avenues to assess other aspects of the impact of eye movements on neural activity in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. Here, I summarize two main lines of this work and some of the stories of the trainees who made essential contributions to these discoveries.

Indexed as

HippocampusAmnesiaAnimalsExploratory BehaviorEye MovementsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansPrimatesRecognition, PsychologyVisual Perceptionentorhinal cortexhippocampusrecognition memorysaccadestheta‐band oscillation

Identifiers

PMID39740028
PMCPMC11685163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.