Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39739979›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Enhanced heart sound classification using Mel frequency cepstral coefficients and comparative analysis of single vs. ensemble classifier strategies.

Mehdi Hosseinzadeh, Amir Haider, Mazhar Hussain Malik, Mohammad Adeli, Olfa Mzoughi, Entesar Gemeay, Mokhtar Mohammadi, Hamid Alinejad-Rokny, Parisa Khoshvaght, Thantrira Porntaveetus and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mehdi HosseinzadehSchool of Computer Science, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam.
Amir HaiderDepartment of AI and Robotics, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Mazhar Hussain MalikSchool of Computing and Creative Technologies College of Arts, Technology and Environment (CATE) University of the West of England Frenchay Campus, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8890-1310
Mohammad AdeliDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Dezful Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dezful, Iran.
Olfa MzoughiDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computer Engineering & Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Entesar GemeayDepartment of Computer Engineering, Computer and Information Technology College, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Mokhtar MohammadiDepartment of Information Technology, College of Engineering and Computer Science, Lebanese French University, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Hamid Alinejad-RoknyUNSW BioMedical Machine Learning Lab (BML), The Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Parisa KhoshvaghtDTU AI and Data Science Hub (DAIDASH), Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam.
Thantrira PorntaveetusFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Physiology, Center of Excellence in Genomics and Precision Dentistry, Clinical Research Center, Geriatric Dentistry and Special Patients Care International Program, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Amir Masoud RahmaniFuture Technology Research Center, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper seeks to enhance the performance of Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) for detecting abnormal heart sounds. Heart sounds are first pre-processed to remove noise and then segmented into S1, systole, S2, and diastole intervals, with thirteen MFCCs estimated from each segment, yielding 52 MFCCs per beat. Finally, MFCCs are used for heart sound classification. For that purpose, a single classifier and an innovative ensemble classifier strategy are presented and compared. In the single classifier strategy, the MFCCs from nine consecutive beats are averaged to classify heart sounds by a single classifier (either a support vector machine (SVM), the k nearest neighbors (kNN), or a decision tree (DT)). Conversely, the ensemble classifier strategy employs nine classifiers (either nine SVMs, nine kNN classifiers, or nine DTs) to individually assess beats as normal or abnormal, with the overall classification based on the majority vote. Both methods were tested on a publicly available phonocardiogram database. The heart sound classification accuracy was 91.95% for the SVM, 91.9% for the kNN, and 87.33% for the DT in the single classifier strategy. Also, the accuracy was 93.59% for the SVM, 91.84% for the kNN, and 92.22% for the DT in the ensemble classifier strategy. Overall, the results demonstrated that MFCCs were more effective than other features, including time, time-frequency, and statistical features, evaluated in similar studies. In addition, the ensemble classifier strategy improved the accuracies of the DT and the SVM by 4.89% and 1.64%, implying that the averaging of MFCCs across multiple phonocardiogram beats in the single classifier strategy degraded the important cues that are required for detecting the abnormal heart sounds, and therefore should be avoided.

Indexed as

Heart SoundsSupport Vector MachineAlgorithmsDecision TreesHumansPhonocardiographySignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID39739979
PMCPMC11687883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.