Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39739917›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Environmental drivers of stream metabolism in a middle TN headwater stream.

Ming Chen, John C Ayers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ming ChenDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0008-0746-826X
John C AyersDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2737-4718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring the seasonal and diurnal variations in headwater stream metabolic regimes can provide critical information for understanding how ecosystems will respond to future environmental changes. In East Fork Creek, a headwater stream in middle Tennessee, week-long field campaigns were set up each month from May 2022 to May 2023 to collect stream metabolism estimators. In a more extensive field campaign from July 2-5 in 2022, diel signals were observed for temperature, pH, turbidity, and concentrations of Ca, Mg, K, Se, Fe, Ba, chloride, nitrate, DIC, DO, DOC, and total algae. Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) and Ecosystem Respiration (ER) were calculated based on a Bayesian model using the dissolved oxygen (DO) time series approach. DO showed diurnal swings between oversaturation in daytime and undersaturation at night, with DO amplitudes being greatest in summer. GPP measurements have a clear seasonal variation, peaking in July and staying low in winter, and strong diel signals that couple with the daily light regime variation. ER does not vary seasonally except for a slight increase in Fall which might be caused by terrestrial organic inputs. The dominant control on GPP is light intensity and on ER is temperature. East Fork Creek shows a heterotrophic metabolic regime for 54 of 57 campaign days and therefore consumes O2 and emits CO2 to the atmosphere throughout the year. If carbon inputs are not a limiting factor, the positive temperature dependence of ER may cause increased CO2 emissions from headwater streams and more frequent hypoxia events in a warming climate.

Indexed as

RiversSeasonsBayes TheoremEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringOxygenTemperatureTennesseeOxygen

Identifiers

PMID39739917
PMCPMC11687656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.