Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39739884›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

A matter of timing: Biting by malaria-infected Anopheles mosquitoes and the use of interventions during the night in rural south-eastern Tanzania.

Isaac Haggai Namango, Sarah J Moore, Carly Marshall, Adam Saddler, David Kaftan, Frank Chelestino Tenywa, Noely Makungwa, Alex J Limwagu, Salum Mapua, Olukayode G Odufuwa and 9 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Estimating mosquito bionomics parameters with a hierarchical Bayesian model.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Seasonal variation and interspecies dynamics amongmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Isaac Haggai NamangoDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7869-1222
Sarah J MooreDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0938-6654
Carly MarshallVector Control Product Testing Unit, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7103-912X
Adam SaddlerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
David KaftanVector Control Product Testing Unit, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0771-1353
Frank Chelestino TenywaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Noely MakungwaVector Control Product Testing Unit, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Alex J LimwaguEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Salum MapuaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3309-4328
Olukayode G OdufuwaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Godfrey LigemaVector Control Product Testing Unit, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Hassan NgonyaniVector Control Product Testing Unit, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Isaya MatanilaVector Control Product Testing Unit, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Jameel BharmalInnovative Vector Control Consortium, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Jason MooreVector Control Product Testing Unit, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Marceline FindaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Fredros OkumuSchool of Life Science and Biotechnology, Nelson Mandela African Institute of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania.
Manuel W HetzelDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5285-3254
Amanda RossDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6027-5645

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowing when and where infected mosquitoes bite is required for estimating accurate measures of malaria risk, assessing outdoor exposure, and designing intervention strategies. This study combines secondary analyses of a human behaviour survey and an entomological survey carried out in the same area to estimate human exposure to malaria-infected Anopheles mosquitoes throughout the night in rural villages in south-eastern Tanzania. Mosquitoes were collected hourly from 6PM to 6AM indoors and outdoors by human landing catches in 2019, and tested for Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite infections using ELISA. In nearby villages, a trained member in each selected household recorded the whereabouts and activities of the household members from 6PM to 6AM in 2016 and 2017. Vector control use was high: 99% of individuals were reported to use insecticide-treated nets and a recent trial of indoor residual spraying had achieved 80% coverage. The risk of being bitten by infected mosquitoes outdoors, indoors in bed, and indoors but not in bed, and use of mosquito nets was estimated for each hour of the night. Individuals were mainly outdoors before 9PM, and mainly indoors between 10PM and 5AM. The main malaria vectors caught were Anopheles funestus sensu stricto and An. arabiensis. Biting rates were higher in the night compared to the evening or early morning. Due to the high use of ITNs, an estimated 85% (95% CI 81%, 88%) of all exposure in children below school age and 76% (71%, 81%) in older household members could potentially be averted by ITNs under current use patterns. Outdoor exposure accounted for an estimated 11% (8%, 15%) of infective bites in children below school age and 17% (13%, 22%) in older individuals. Maintaining high levels of ITN access, use and effectiveness remains important for reducing malaria transmission in this area. Interventions against outdoor exposure would provide additional protection.

Identifiers

PMID39739884
PMCPMC11687804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.