ArticlePloS one2024
Data mining of adverse drug event signals with Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir from FAERS.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir and Molnupiravir in Non-Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Drug-related problems and challenges encountered by pharmacists in nirmatrelvir/ritonavir counselling during the covid-19 pandemic: a multi-center study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative Pharmacovigilance Analysis of Approved and Repurposed Antivirals for COVID-19: Insights from EudraVigilance Data.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Neuropsychiatric Adverse Reactions Associated with Remdesivir and Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in COVID-19 Treatment: Insights from EudraVigilance Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir, acting as an effective agent against COVID-19, has achieved considerable results in clinical studies in terms of drug efficacy. However, there is little research about its medication safety. Based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database, this study aims to mine the adverse reaction signals of the latest major recommended drug Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir for the antiviral treatment of COVID-19, so as to provide a basis for safe and rational drug use. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used to explore the adverse event report data of all COVID-19 emergency use authorization (EUA) products in the FAERS database with the deadline of third quarter of 2023. In the analysis, 135427 adverse drug event (ADE) reports were found, and 35250 ADEs were reported with Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir as the primary suspected drug, which was involved in multiple system. There was a high signal intensity of dysgeusia (ROR = 72.98), diarrhea (ROR = 3.03) and headache (ROR = 1.25), which was compatible with the adverse reactions recorded in the manual for Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir. In addition, it was suggested that Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir might cause pale-colored stools (ROR = 45.53), chromaturia (ROR = 3.07), yellow skin (ROR = 3.62), tongue coating (ROR = 35.55) and other new adverse reactions (not included in the instructions manual for Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir). The ADEs of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir that are not in the instructions and are highly relevant in the real world are supplemented, prompting clinical attention to the ADEs of the drug, and providing a theoretical basis for the safe and effective application of the drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.