ArticlePloS one2024
The effect of gravity on hand spatio-temporal kinematic features during functional movements.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of the Meta Quest 3 for upper limb kinematic analysis: accuracy, consistency, agreement and reliability.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Neurophysiological effects of partial gravity on bimanual control: a parabolic flight study.NPJ microgravity · 2026Article
- Insights into motor control: predict muscle activity from upper limb kinematics with LSTM networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating contrastive cross-modal attention and stacked GRU for hand function rehabilitation robot control.PloS one · 2026Article
- Reducing Upper-Limb Muscle Effort with Model-Based Gravity Compensation During Robot-Assisted Movement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessment of upper limb motor control: establishing normative benchmarks for clinical applications.PeerJ · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the impact of gravity on daily upper-limb movements is crucial for comprehending upper-limb impairments. This study investigates the relationship between gravitational force and upper-limb mobility by analyzing hand trajectories from 24 healthy subjects performing nine pick-and-place tasks, captured using a motion capture system. The results reveal significant differences in motor behavior in terms of planning, smoothness, efficiency, and accuracy when movements are performed against or with gravity. Analysis showed that upward movements (g-) resembled transversal ones (g0) but differed significantly from downward movements (g+). Corrective movements in g+ began later than in g- and g0, indicating different motor planning models. Velocity profiles highlighted smoother movements in g- and g0 compared to g+. Smoothness was lower in g+, indicating less coordinated movements. Efficiency showed significant variability with no specific trends due to subjective task duration among subjects. This study highlights the importance of considering gravitational effects when evaluating upper-limb movements, especially for individuals with neurological impairments. Planning metrics, including Percent Time to Peak Velocity and Percent Time to Peak Standard Deviation, showed significant differences between g- and g0 compared to g+, supporting Fitts' law on the trade-off between speed and accuracy. Two novel indications were also introduced: the Target Position Error and the Minimum Required Tunnel. These new indicators provided insights into hand-eye coordination and movement variability. The findings suggest that motor planning, smoothness, and efficiency are significantly influenced by gravity, emphasizing the need for differentiated approaches in assessing and rehabilitating upper-limb impairments. Future research should explore these metrics in impaired populations to develop targeted rehabilitation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.