ArticlePLOS global public health2024
The burden of medical contraindications to corneal donation: Time for review.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Corneal graft (keratoplasty) is the most common allograft in the world, but the imbalance between the number of donors and the number of patients waiting for transplants is abysmal on a global scale and varies enormously from one country to another. The risk of transmission of systemic diseases from donor to recipient is demonstrably low. In over 50 years and an estimated 2.5 million transplants, only 8 cases of rabies, 2 cases of hepatitis B and 2 cases of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) have been documented. Conversely, other cases of rabies, HIV, hep C, hep B and CJD have not been transmitted via keratoplasty. The list of medical contraindications (CI) to corneal donation also includes diseases for which no actual, only theoretical, risk has been identified, in particular, neurodegenerative diseases, hematological malignancies, melanomas, tumors of the central nervous system, neoplastic meningitis and lymphangitic carcinomatosis. Their contribution to the reduction in the potential donor pool has not previously been investigated. We analyzed 45 months of exhaustive data from the hospital coordination for organ and tissue procurement at St-Etienne University Hospital (01/01/2020 to 06/09/2023). Out of the 2349 consecutive potential donors' files analyzed by the coordination team,1346 (57%) had an CI to donation. The identification of a neurodegenerative disease was the most frequent, accounting for 16% of the files examined and 29% of CIs. Of these, 75% were related to cognitive disorders. The 5 diseases or families of diseases for which there is only theoretical risk of transmission equated to a loss of 712 potential donors, corresponding to 30% of the files examined and 53% of all CIs. Of the 1003 deceased without CI, 738 families (74%) were contacted. No objection to donation was received in 52% of cases, enabling 385 procurements to be carried out. Removing these 5 CIs would have increased the number of donors by 71% (658 instead of 385). The potential pool of corneal donors is significantly restricted by a group of CIs introduced decades ago in response to a theoretical transmission of disease. A substantive amount of evidence now suggests that many CIs now need to be reviewed, modified or discarded altogether. This approach will result in a highly significant worldwide increase in the availability of corneas for transplant and have an immediate and major impact in reducing corneal blindness across the globe. We propose that this reduction in CIs be accompanied by a prospective evaluation process, by allocating the corneas of these donors to patients aged 75 years and over, and by monitoring them for a minimum of 5 years.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.