Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39739748›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2024

Human-machine interactions with clinical phrase prediction system, aligning with Zipf's least effort principle?

Jamil Zaghir, Mina Bjelogrlic, Jean-Philippe Goldman, Julien Ehrsam, Christophe Gaudet-Blavignac, Christian Lovis

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jamil ZaghirDivision of Medical Information Sciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8209-6098
Mina BjelogrlicDivision of Medical Information Sciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jean-Philippe GoldmanDivision of Medical Information Sciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Julien EhrsamDivision of Medical Information Sciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christophe Gaudet-BlavignacDivision of Medical Information Sciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christian LovisDivision of Medical Information Sciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2681-8076

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The essence of language and its evolutionary determinants have long been research subjects with multifaceted explorations. This work reports on a large-scale observational study focused on the language use of clinicians interacting with a phrase prediction system in a clinical setting. By adopting principles of adaptation to evolutionary selection pressure, we attempt to identify the major determinants of language emergence specific to this context. The observed adaptation of clinicians' language behaviour with technology have been confronted to properties shaping language use, and more specifically on two driving forces: conciseness and distinctiveness. Our results suggest that users tailor their interactions to meet these specific forces to minimise the effort required to achieve their objective. At the same time, the study shows that the optimisation is mainly driven by the distinctive nature of interactions, favouring communication accuracy over ease. These results, published for the first time on a large-scale observational study to our knowledge, offer novel fundamental qualitative and quantitative insights into the mechanisms underlying linguistic behaviour among clinicians and its potential implications for language adaptation in human-machine interactions.

Indexed as

LanguageMan-Machine SystemsCommunicationFemaleHumansLinguisticsMale

Identifiers

PMID39739748
PMCPMC11687647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.