Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39739628›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational science2025

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple dose, parallel study to investigate the effects of a cathepsin S inhibitor in celiac disease.

Darren Bentley, Marie Mannino, Marianne Manchester, Priscila Camillo Teixeira, Bernhard Reis, Malcolm Boyce, Sandra Nagel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02679014 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple Dose, Parallel Study to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamic Effects, Safety and Tolerability of Repeated Dosing of RO5459072 in Volunteers With Celiac Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02679014 phase1completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple Dose, Parallel Study to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamic Effects, Safety and Tolerability of Repeated Dosing of RO5459072 in Volunteers With Celiac Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2016 to 2016Enrolled19ConditionsCeliac DiseaseArmsPlacebo, RO5459072
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Beyond gluten-free diet: Novel therapeutic frontiers in celiac disease armamentarium.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Darren BentleyCertara UK Ltd., Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2136-9264
Marie ManninoBristol Myers Squibb, Lawrence Township, New Jersey, USA.
Marianne ManchesterF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Priscila Camillo TeixeiraF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Bernhard ReisF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7611-8222
Malcolm BoyceHammersmith Medicines Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8807-612X
Sandra NagelF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Celiac disease is a chronic, immune-mediated enteropathy with symptoms triggered by exposure to dietary gluten in genetically predisposed individuals. The only available management option is lifelong adherence to a gluten-free diet. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-center study tested the effects of the cathepsin S inhibitor RO5459072 on the immune response to a 13-day gluten challenge in 19 participants with celiac disease (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02679014). Nine participants in the RO5459072 arm received 100 mg study drug b.i.d. (200 mg daily); 10 received a placebo. The primary end point was the number of responders to the gluten challenge (defined as individuals with an increase in the number of gliadin-specific, IFNγ-secreting T cells detected using an ELISPOT assay). However, there was a weak response to the gluten challenge across both arms. Few participants had an increase in gliadin-specific, IFNγ-secreting T cells, and the antigen-specific responses (anti-tTG and anti-DGP antibodies) were weaker than expected in both arms. Therefore, the primary end point was not met, although the study was underpowered to detect a treatment effect under these circumstances. Pharmacodynamic findings suggested that RO5459072 had some beneficial effects. Fewer participants in the RO5459072 arm exhibited gliadin-specific IFNγ-secreting T cells after 6 days' gluten intake. Participants in the RO5459072 arm also showed decreased intestinal permeability, and a decrease in the number of circulating B cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells compared to baseline. Nevertheless, the absence of clear effects on the response to a gluten challenge indicates that inhibition of cathepsin S may not be an effective treatment strategy for celiac disease.

Indexed as

CathepsinsCeliac DiseaseGlutensAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGliadinHumansInterferon-gammaMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultcathepsin SCathepsinsGliadinGlutensInterferon-gamma

Identifiers

PMID39739628
PMCPMC11686337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.