ArticlePloS one2024
Exploring the patient's recovery journey and information needs following a shoulder fracture: A qualitative interview study.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShoulder fractures (proximal humerus fractures) are common, painful, debilitating injuries. Recovery is a long process often hindered by complications such as mal-union and frozen shoulder. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the experiences and information needs of people at different time points after a shoulder fracture and how views on recovery change over time.
methodsThis longitudinal telephone interview study used a semi-structured approach based on a pre-planned interview topic guide. Recruitment was from June to November 2023. Participants were interviewed approximately two months and five to six months after their injury. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
results14 participants were recruited (age range 44-80 years; three male). The themes identified were dependence, vulnerability, information needs, and recovery. Loss of function and identity were associated with dependence. Feelings of vulnerability were present for most participants at six months post-injury. Information needs evolved, with information about the extent of the injury and practical advice needed first, but later participants emphasized the importance of reassurance and expected timelines for recovery. Recovery meant regaining function and independence, and returning to meaningful activities, which was also not fully achieved for most participants by six months.
conclusionsThis study is the first to explore information needs and experiences along the timeline of recovery from a shoulder fracture. What recovery means to individual patients, along with recognition of the extent to which feelings of vulnerability affect recovery are important factors to consider. Clinicians should be aware of the full impact of these injuries to guide patients on their recovery journey, including identifying feelings of vulnerability and regaining their identity. Adopting a person-centred care approach, and considering the changing priorities and information needs of patients throughout their recovery journey may lead to improved patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.