ArticleMedical care2025
Facility-Level Differences in Antipsychotic Drug Use: Impact on Quality Outcomes for Nursing Home Residents.
Article in Medical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo quantify quality of care following an admission to a nursing home with low or high antipsychotic drug use.
backgroundMisuse of antipsychotics in U.S. nursing homes is a huge concern for policymakers.
methodsWe utilized an instrumental variable approach to estimate the effect of facility-level antipsychotic use on patient outcomes. The instrument was the differential distance to the nearest low-use antipsychotic nursing home relative to the nearest high-use antipsychotic nursing home. Post-acute care short-stay and long-stay residents in U.S. nursing homes were identified using Medicare administrative claims and the Minimum Dataset 3.0 (2014-2019). Outcomes included hospitalizations, falls, pressure ulcers, physical restraint use, medication use, and diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disease, anxiety, or depression.
resultsAmong long-stay residents, receiving care from a low-use facility reduced the diagnosis of schizophrenia, use of restraints, and hospitalizations. There was also a reduction in the hospitalization rate [-0.9 percentage point (pp)], likelihood of long-stay status (-1.8 pp), and diagnosis of schizophrenia (-0.2 pp) at 90 days among short-stay residents. We also observed larger reductions among residents with dementia and serious mental illness.
conclusionsAdmission to a nursing home with a low use of antipsychotics led to decreased hospitalizations, restraint use, and diagnosis of schizophrenia. Curbing the high use of antipsychotics remains a priority of policymakers as the centers for medicare and medicaid services conducts off-site audits to assess whether nursing homes accurately code residents with schizophrenia. It will be important to monitor if centers for medicare and medicaid services downgrades any quality star ratings due to inappropriate coding and assess the implications on quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.