Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39739528›Full record

ArticleAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2025

The Value of P-Wave Parameters Changes in Predicting Catheter Ablation Outcomes for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

Ibrahim Antoun, Xin Li, Zakariyya Vali, Ahmed Kotb, Ahmed Abdelrazik, Ivelin Koev, Riyaz Somani, G André Ng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ibrahim AntounDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Xin LiDepartment of Engineering, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Zakariyya ValiDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Ahmed KotbDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Clinical Science Wing, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Ahmed AbdelrazikDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-5225-1337
Ivelin KoevDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Riyaz SomaniDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
G André NgDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.

Funding

British Heart foundation (BHF) RG/17/3/32774Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/S037306/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the most promising management method for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). The P wave in the electrocardiogram (ECG) represents atrial depolarization. This study aims to correlate P-wave parameters after PVI with outcomes.

methodsThis single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients with first-time PVI for PAF between 2018 and 2019 and targeted pulmonary veins (PVs). Procedure success was defined by freedom of ECG-documented AF at 12 months. Digital 12 leads ECGs with 1-50 hertz bandpass filter were monitored before the procedure. P-wave amplitude (PWA) and P-wave terminal force in V1 (PTFV1) Corrected P-wave duration (PWDc), and P-wave dispersion (PWDisp), were measured before and after ablation.

resultsThe final analysis included 180 patients, of which 130 (72%) had successful ablations and 53 (30%) had radiofrequency ablation (RF). Males comprised 71% of the patients; the mean age was 60. Demographics were similar between both arms p < 0.001. Patients with failed PVI had increased PWDc after PVI (139-146 ms, p < 0.001) compared to patients with successful PVI. PWA increased significantly after failed PVI (1.6-2 mV, p < 0.001) and successful PVI (1.6-1.8 mV, p = 0.008). PWD (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4-4.2, p < 0.001) and PWA (HR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2-2.9, p = 0.03) were independently associated with PVI failure at 12 months. PWdisp and PTFV1 were not correlated with outcomes.

conclusionIncreased PWDc and PWA after PVI were independently associated with failed ablation for PAF, supporting the role of P-wave parameters in predicting outcomes.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationElectrocardiographyPulmonary VeinsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeatrial fibrillationcatheter ablationP‐waveP‐wave amplitudeP‐wave duration

Identifiers

PMID39739528
PMCPMC11686087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.