Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39739415›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2025

Do Medicare Beneficiaries Under Accountable Care or Medicare Advantage Use Lower Quality Nursing Homes?

Huiying Wang, Cyrus Kosar, Momotazur Rahman, Vince Mor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Huiying WangCenter for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Cyrus KosarCenter for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Momotazur RahmanCenter for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8592-3511
Vince MorCenter for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Funding

VARIATIONS IN LIFE'S FINAL CHAPTERP01AG027296 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI AMAL N. TRIVEDI · 2007 to 2026
$38.9M
NIA NIH HHS 2P01AG027296-1NIA NIH HHS P01 AG027296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the growing number of Medicare beneficiaries attributed to Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) or enrolled in Medicare Advantage (MA) and their financial incentives to lower the cost of the cared patients, it is essential to understand how these alternative payment models affect post-acute outcomes among beneficiaries, with or without dementia diagnoses. In this study, we examined the quality of skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) that beneficiaries entered after hospital discharge under different payment models. STUDY

participantsMedicare beneficiaries who were discharged from hospitals and admitted to SNFs between 2013 and 2018. KEY MEASURES: The exposure variable was a payment indicator, including ACO, MA, or non-ACO traditional Medicare (TM) fee-for-service. The dependent variable was high overall quality SNF, defined as with at least 4-star rating in the CMS Nursing Home Care Compare. ANALYTIC PLAN: We examined the payer distribution by dementia diagnosis using ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) fixed effects and adjusted for age, gender, and race. We also estimated the probabilities of entering high-quality SNF as a function of payer status and dementia diagnosis each year using hospital and ZCTA fixed effects and accounting for beneficiary-level covariates.

resultsAmong SNF admissions from 2013 to 2018, the share of ACO-attributed beneficiaries increased from 7.6% to 20.2%, MA enrollees increased from 25.2% to 32.8%, and non-ACO-attributed TM enrollees decreased from 67.2% to 47.3%. Consistently, ACO-attributed beneficiaries were the most likely, while MA enrollees were the least likely to enter high-quality SNFs, regardless of dementia diagnosis.

conclusionsOur findings highlight significant differences in access to high-quality SNFs across Medicare payment models, with ACO-attributed beneficiaries consistently experiencing better access than their MA or traditional Medicare counterparts, regardless of dementia diagnosis. These results underscore the need for further investigation into how payment models influence care quality and access, particularly for vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

Accountable Care OrganizationsMedicare Part CNursing HomesQuality of Health CareSkilled Nursing FacilitiesAgedAged, 80 and overDementiaFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHumansMaleMedicareUnited StatesAccountable Care OrganizationAlzheimer's disease and related dementiasMedicare advantageskilled nursing facility

Identifiers

PMID39739415
PMCPMC12101943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.