Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39739332›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2024

Vein watershed analysis locational method versus computed tomography-guided percutaneous localization for detecting non-palpable peripheral pulmonary nodules: a real-world study of non-inferiority.

Chen Huang, Zi-Hao Chen, Li-Shan Peng, Jia-Tao Zhang, Jun-Tao Lin, Sheng Zhang, Jie Yang, Ben-Yuan Jiang, Xue-Ning Yang, Wen-Zhao Zhong and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Advancements in Research on Preoperative Localization of Pulmonary Nodules].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chen HuangGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital & Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Zi-Hao ChenGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Li-Shan PengGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jia-Tao ZhangGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jun-Tao LinGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Sheng ZhangGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jie YangGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ben-Yuan JiangGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xue-Ning YangGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wen-Zhao ZhongGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital & Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4302-9332
Qiang NieGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6949-2037

Funding

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Translational Medicine 2017B030314120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn recent years, with the advancement of sublobar resection, a safe, painless method for locating peripheral pulmonary nodules was needed. Previously, an alternative method of arterial watershed localization was introduced to remedy the shortcomings of preoperative computed tomography (CT)-guided localization or other methods for locating pulmonary nodules, but its technical limitations were discovered during clinical applications. Therefore, we developed a technique to localize non-subpleural nodules using basin analysis of the target vein and validated its feasibility and safety.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of surgical cases of pulmonary nodules smaller than 2 cm in our centre. The vein watershed locational method (V-WALM) was compared with CT-guided percutaneous puncture localization wedge dissection in terms of success rate, the mean duration of the operation, mean volume of intraoperative bleeding and median postoperative stay, mean postoperative drainage and mean drainage tube indwelling time.

resultsV-WALM and CT-guided localization were used for localized resection of pulmonary nodules in 50 patients. The localization success rates were 94.0% for V-WALM and 90.0% for CT-guided localization, respectively, with no statistical difference noted. In addition, no statistical difference in patient population distribution between the 2 groups was noted. The operating time was 95.5 ± 26.4 min for V-WALM and 94.3 ± 37.5 min for CT-guided localization, with no statistical difference. Neither were there statistical differences in intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage and drainage tube indwelling time. The lymph node sampling rate of V-WALM was 48.0%, which was much higher than the 24% noted in the CT-guided localization group.

conclusionsThe results of this study demonstrate that V-WALM is a safe and feasible intraoperative localization method for peripheral lung nodules. It provides a high-precision, fast and minimally invasive approach to intraoperative localization.

Indexed as

locationalpulmonary nodulethoracoscopic wedge resectionthree-dimensional reconstructionwatershed analysis

Identifiers

PMID39739332
PMCPMC11758505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.