Trial reportAIDS and behavior2025
Different Classes of HIV-Preventive Behavioral Intention Among Youths Vulnerable to HIV Acquisition.
Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The HIV incidence rate continues to increase among youth, especially among young men who have sex with men (YMSM) and young transgender women (YTW). To date, behavioral intention has often been viewed as the likelihood of engaging in prevention behaviors and emphasized as a key antecedent for condom use, disclosure of serostatus, and PrEP use among people living with HIV. In addition, individuals with different sociodemographic factors may have varying degrees of HIV prevention intention, which is a critical knowledge needed to identify facilitators and barriers to HIV prevention intention. This is a secondary data analysis of baseline data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) (N = 488). This study aimed to identify distinct, latent classes of HIV prevention intention among youth vulnerable to HIV acquisition and to understand the sociodemographic and contextual factors associated with each latent class. Latent class analysis was conducted to identify meaningful latent classes of youths based on HIV prevention intention. Class 1: "High condomless sex, low serosorting, low PrEP intention," Class 2: "High condomless sex, high serosorting, low PrEP intention," Class 3: "Moderate condom use, serosorting, low PrEP intention," and Class 4: "Moderate condom use, high serosorting, moderate PrEP intention" were identified. Significant differences were found in age, sexual orientation, level of education, current employment status, annual household income, housing/living arrangement, and relationship status. Overall, YMSM and YTW without a recent history of HIV testing or PrEP use may have particularly low intentions for HIV prevention, and therefore may be at higher risk for HIV infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.