ArticleAIDS and behavior2025
County-Level Factors Associated with Reversal of Insurer-Approved HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Prescriptions in the United States, 2018.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disparities in HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Reversal and Abandonment by Race and Income: An Intersectional Approach.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying county-level factors that influence pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence is critical for ending the HIV epidemic in the United States (US). PrEP primary reversal is a term used to describe patients who do not obtain their prescribed medication from the pharmacy. This study sought to identify factors associated with PrEP reversal at the county level in 2018. Data were collected from Symphony Health Analytics, AIDS Vu, the US Census Bureau, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Prevention Information Network. Bivariate Choropleth maps were created to identify counties with high and low levels of PrEP reversal and HIV incidence. This was followed by bivariate analysis to determine the association between predictor variables and percent PrEP reversal. Finally multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the association between percent PrEP reversal and variables that were significant from the bivariate analysis. A total of 308 counties were included in this analysis, where the mean number of PrEP prescriptions for counties was 44, with a median of 14 (Interquartile range 7-34). In the multivariable analysis, counties with higher level of unemployment (aOR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05-1.16) and rural counties (1.10: 1.04-1.17) had higher odds of PrEP reversal; while counties with higher household crowding (0.97: 0.95-0.99) had lower odds of PrEP reversal. Findings show the need for expanding and implementing programs as well as policies to improve PrEP services that are tailored to local socioeconomic circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.