ArticleJournal of fluorescence2025
Biowaste-Derived Carbon Dots-Based Molecularly Imprinted Fluorescent Nanosensor for Selective Detection of Rutin.
Article in Journal of fluorescence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biosensor Technologies for Water Quality: Detection of Emerging Contaminants and Pathogens.Biosensors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, Waste pine nut shells were used as organic carbon source of biomass to synthesize carbon quantum dots. A highly responsive and selective fluorescent nanosensor (Si-doped biomass-derived carbon dots with molecular imprinted polymers, Si-CDs@MIPs) was designed for determination of Rutin (RT) in Chinese herbal substances like Sophora japonica L.. Not only was the synthesis method simple, environmentally friendly but also can selectively capture and specifically recognize the target compound RT, which was accomplished by a single-step hydrothermal process. The RT content in the real sample is 21%, with a recovery rate ranging from 89.7 to 106.3%, demonstrating excellent reproducibility. The nanosensor can selectively detect RT at a detection limit of 12.5 nmol/L. Therefore, it is showed that Si-CDs@MIPs will be feasible as a sensor for the rapid measurement of RT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39739233What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.